What was the status granted to war-disabled men from the French colonial empire after the First World War? By virtue of their sacrifice for the Fatherland, did they deserve credit equal to those from Metropolitan France?
In France, several studies on the war disabled men of the First World War have focused on Metropolitan France and ignored the fate of the war-disabled men from the colonial empire, who were very few compared to the nearly one million disabled persons in Metropolitan France. Continuer la lecture →
The shift towards liberal legalities in the field of vocational integration of the disabled.
After World War II, the International Labour Office promoted a new policy of vocational rehabilitation of the disabled which clearly differed from its earlier policy (use of a system of quotas in public administrations and private companies to place the war-disabled, maintenance of integral wages). The policies of vocational rehabilitation shifted in a liberal-economic direction, and this shift is visible thanks to the adoption by the 38th International Labour Conference of the Vocational Rehabilitation (Disabled) Recommendation (n°99). Recommendation n°99 of the ILO promoted professional training, vocational guidance and selective placement for all disabled people who had a reasonable prospect of securing and retaining suitable employment, whatever the nature and the origin of their disability. This policy reorientation was facilitated by the leadership role of the United States and the United Kingdom within the International Labour Organisation (ILO).
The contents of the ILO vocational rehabilitation policy had been seriously discussed only from 1953, with the preparation of a new international standard on vocational rehabilitation by the International Labour Conference. During the 37th and 38th International Labour Conferences, the government representatives of the two power blocs promoted in their speeches labour measures inspired by their respective ideologies. During this period of cold war, the rehabilitation of disabled citizens became part of this ideological competition between the two power blocs within the ILO. Continuer la lecture →
The Anglo-Saxon countries are generally considered the main sites that generate protest and emancipatory projects at an international level. Some American and English associations used diverse means of protest (demonstrations, sit-ins, bus chaining, etc.) during the 1970s in order to defend their rights. Sociologists Sharon Barnartt and Richard Scotch listed 97 protests initiated by disabled people and deaf people in the United States between 1970 and 1982 (Barnartt, Scotch, 2001). The actions from the United States and from England share some common goals: the fight against charitable and paternalistic attitudes and discrimination, and the fight for access to self-determination and accessibility. However, mobilisations in the United States distinguish themselves by the way in which they defend a specific community organisation, that is, the centers for independent living founded on mutual aid and consumerism (Longmore, 2003). The English mobilizations distinguish themselves by the revendication of a social interpretation of disability (inspired by Marxism), by the Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation association (Shakespeare, 1993).
The period between 1973 and 1981 was identified by James Charlton as a crucial period for the disability rights movements at an international level (Charlton, 1998). We think it is necessary to extend this to at least the earlier date of 1968, identified by Michelle Zancarini as the time of a protesting trend at an international level, marked by politicization and aspiration to social change in several social sectors (Zancarini-Fournel, 2008)). The chronology of this protesting decade varies from country to country, but it could be said to last from the beginning of 1960 until 1981.
This decade (1960’s-1981) is characterized by the significant promotion of the disability rights concept at an international level. It starts at the end of the 1960s when several NGOs (Fédération internationale des mutilés, des invalides du travail et des invalides civils, International League of Societies for the Mentally Handicapped, International Society for Rehabilitation of the Disabled) adopt a program of social claims, and ends with the UN’s organization of the International Year for Disabled people in 1981, which also has consequences in 1982. These two factors – the political fervour and the promotion of the concept of rights – act as catalysts inside disability rights movements. In many countries they initiate the increase of a social culture of protest, the regular, large-scale use of protests inside the public sphere in order to defend their rights, and the building of new emancipatory utopias. Continuer la lecture →
Depuis plus d’une décennie, l’intérêt des sociologues occidentaux pour l’expérience de vie des personnes handicapées dans les pays du Sud s’accroît. Cet intérêt s’accompagne d’une réflexion sur l’influence de la situation post-coloniale sur les conditions de vie de ces personnes handicapées. Clare Barker met ainsi en avant l’utilité de la littérature postcoloniale pour comprendre la complexité du phénomène du handicap dans les pays post-coloniaux (Barker, 2010). Considérant qu’il était nécessaire d’étudier les conséquences du colonialisme, Shaun Grech a essayé d’analyser les liens entre colonialisme et handicap à partir des travaux historiques existant sur l’Amérique Latine, l’Afrique et l’Asie. Ce faisant, il homogénéise les expériences des colonisations, et dresse un tableau assez uniforme des conséquences néfastes de la colonisation sur les personnes handicapées (rôle des missions chrétiennes dans le dénigrement des croyances non chrétiennes; violence physique et mutilations comme instrument de punition coloniale ; valeur monétaire attribuée au corps escalavagisé ; rôle des professionnels médicaux occidentaux dans l’imposition d’un nouveau modèle d’appréhension du corps infirme ; rôle des expériences médicales sur les corps) (Grech, 2015). L’auteur note avec justesse que les historiens occidentaux du handicap négligent d’étudier le fait colonial, et qu’il faut impérativement comprendre comment le colonisé appréhende le handicap et gère les personnes handicapées (Grech, 2015, p. 12). Continuer la lecture →